or  
  • Sign In
  • Sign In
  • Tools Sign In
  • Calendar
  • Menu
  • Sign In

PJM©

  • about pjm
  • training
  • committees & groups
  • planning
  • markets & operations
  • library

  • Missing
  • Missing
  • Missing
  • Missing
  • Home
  • Three Priorities
  • Keeping the Lights On
  • Queue Point Data FAQs
  • Should my maximum fault current value be RMS or peak?
Learning Center
More Questions

Question:

Should my maximum fault current value be RMS or peak?



Answer:

Maximum fault current should be entered as an RMS value on a per-unit system. For our studies, PJM needs the RMS, per unit value of the max current 2–3 cycles after a fault has occurred (not the momentary instantaneous peak in the first cycle of a fault).



Queue Point Data FAQs
  1. If my System Impact Study data is the same as my Feasibility Study data, do I still need to create an SIS data submission?
  2. I’m trying to attach my required documents in Queue Point, but they are being rejected because the files are too large. What should I do?
  3. I’ve already created a Feasibility Study data submission in Queue Point. How do I create one for System Impact Study for the same project?
  4. What kind of dynamic model information do I need to submit for my project in the Queue Point System Impact Study data form?
  5. Which dynamic models are considered acceptable?
  6. Should my maximum fault current value be RMS or peak?
  7. I'm locked out of my Queue Point account. What should I do?

  • Follow us on:
  • InsideLines
  • follow us on facebook
  • rss feed
  • follow us on LinkedIn
  • follow us on Twitter
  • follow us on YouTube
  • follow us on Threads
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Learning Center
  • Glossary
  • RSS Feeds
  • Site Map
  • PJM © 1999-2025 All rights reserved.
  • Legal and Privacy